YoHo1975
No, it would not, but if they are making money, then that conductor could sue to take any money that video made.
Oh come on.
In this clip, the railfan was merely shooting a train doing some work. The conductor is just incidental. Pause the video and look at it as a still photo. What % of the frame does the conductor occupy? 1% maybe? He's not even recognizable. In some shots the conductor doesn't even appear. The railfan is just shooting a train. The fact that the crew is bored and wants to b1t<h about something (briefly) does not equate with the railfan doing something wrong; he's not doing anything wrong whatsoever. The conductor is not recognizable, and he's not presented in a negative light.
I think Jaw Tooth was wrong to keep filming when, in the other clip, the conductor came over to confront him and was recognizable. JT should have stopped filming, and in any event should not have used that part.
Maybe the conductor is nervous because he is calling out the coupling distances from too far away and at a bad angle. If he's skirting the rules, thats not JT's fault.
But sheeesh, as controversy goes, this doesn't begin to reach vanilla pudding status.
